Changes in Rome

The death of Pope John Paul II must in many ways mark the end of an era however similar his views are to those of his close collaborator, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, elected Pope Benedict XVI.

The long papacy of John Paul II will I am sure go down in history as one of the most significant of all papacies. His influence is felt in so many varied areas of life. What he achieved and what he attempted to achieve are most important to discern, ponder, evaluate and use as assistance to the future. First of all he was undoubtedly a major force in the ending of communism in Eastern Europe. With his experience of life in Poland during the darkest days of the Nazi occupation of the 2nd world war to be followed by the terrible oppression of soviet communism; he was able to use all his authority and gifts to work with others to undermine communism with such spectacular results in 1989 in Eastern Europe and in 1991 with the dissolution of the USSR. Secondly, in the following decades he challenges the western world in they way they lived. He challenged our values, our disregard for the dignity of all human life, our neglect of the pursuit of peace, social justice, and justice to the developing world.  Thirdly, after a period following the 2nd Vatican Council in the 1960’s when many Roman Catholics felt uneasy, he sought to reestablish a firm basis for belief, and ministerial practice. Lastly, and perhaps this will be his most lasting legacy, comes his example of priestly life. This includes his obviously deep and generous spirituality, his reaching out to so many in the world through his great journeys not least people who are ill, dying and handicapped, also to the young people of the world. His priestly life was also shown in his continuing with his ministry as best he could when ill and handicapped himself as well as in the manner of his dying.

It will take time, prayer and though to sift through some of what he did and determine how appropriate it is for the world emerging. He polarized Christian living with living without God, secular living. Would a more gentle, conversational relationship be more helpful to gospel values in the future or not? Would a more collegial style of church government be more creative in the future or not? These are the sort of questions all Christians are called to ponder and decide.

Pope Benedict XVI has had a rich and diverse experience of life. Coming from a deeply devout rural Bavarian Catholic family; he had a first class education and became a Professor of Theology. As a student of theology I was deeply impressed with his lectures at Tubingen University ‘Introduction to Christianity’ which I read with great benefit. These were given with obvious sympathy for those who face the difficulties faith presents; he ensures that he is faithful to the spirit of Christianity as well as open to the problems that acceptance of it causes. The great upheaval of 1968 especially in the University of Tubingen made Ratzinger rethink his position. He left Tubingen for Regensburg where he took a more traditional line. After less than four years as Archbishop of Munich, he became Prefect of the Congregation for the Defence of the Faith. This is the post in Rome that ensures the orthodoxy of the church. Working closely with John Paul II the boundaries of acceptable expression of the faith were drawn more tightly.

Historical experience shows that popes are unpredictable; some differ from their previous approach in one way, others in another way. We must wait and see. He is said to have taken the name Benedict for three reasons. Firstly St Benedict is the patron of Europe. Secondly, Benedict XV (elected pope just after the first world war broke out, 1914 to 1922) served a short time and suffered. Thirdly, Benedict XV was a pope of peace and reconciliation.

All of this should, I believe, give rise to long and hard thought and prayer on the part of the Church of England. We need to ask ourselves whether our church today is sufficiently assisting the growth of its members in holiness. Are there issues about our spirituality, our liturgy, our doctrine, our belief that need revision? We are, I believe, assisted in our wrestling with these issues as we enter a conversation with our Roman Catholic sisters and brothers to sharpen what it is that divides us, what moves can help us grow closer, where exactly do our presently irreconcilable differences lie? In all of this may God guide his whole church so his people follow more closely his ways.

Christopher Morgan-Jones

Go to Next Page

Go to Previous Page

Go to Index Page

Go to Home Page